PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. vs Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.: FDA Enforcement Comparison

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. has been the subject of 205 FDA enforcement/approval records tracked by Argus HQ, compared to 12 for Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd..

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.: 0 warning letters, 205 recalls, 0 approval records, 0 Form 483s.

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.: 0 warning letters, 12 recalls, 0 approval records, 0 Form 483s.

Side by side

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. — Warning letters0

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. — Warning letters0

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. — Recalls205

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. — Recalls12

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. — Approval records0

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. — Approval records0

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. — Form 483s0

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. — Form 483s0

Timeline

PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.

Most recent FDA action: August 19, 2026

Full history →

Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.

Most recent FDA action: October 7, 2026

Full history →

Cite this comparison

Pre-formatted for a story, footnote, or reference list:

"PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. vs Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.: FDA Enforcement Comparison." Argus HQ, accessed October 13, 2026. https://argushq.ai/compare/philips-medical-systems-nederland-b-v-vs-shanghai-united-imaging-healthcare-co-ltd

Source: FDA.gov (aggregated across Warning Letters, Recalls, Approvals, Form 483s) ↗